Modelling Host-Microbiome Interactions

methods and madness

Bob Week - Kiel University

Who am I

  • Background: Mathematical evolution and ecology
  • Was a postdoc with Brendan Bohannan 2022-2024
  • Now a postdoc with Hinrich Schulenburg at Kiel University

Overview (two parts)

  1. ACROSS HOST GENERATION DYNAMICS (host-microbiome feedback)
  • Modelling host-microbiome evolution
  • Extended inheritance frameworks
  • Microbiome-mediated rescue
  • Microbiome-extended quantitative genetics
    • A gap: microbiome inheritance ??
    • motivates…
  1. WITHIN HOST GENERATION DYNAMICS (microbiomes structured by fixed hosts)
  • Modelling microbiome community dynamics and transmission
  • Metacommunity Framework
  • Viscocity hypothesis

We live in a microbial world

Microbiomes mediate host trait variation

Microbiomes can be inherited

Can Microbiomes facilitate adaptation?

  • Lewontins Conditions \(\uparrow\) for evolutionary adaptation

But microbiomes not like nuclear genes…

  • Community assembly (microbial dispersal, within-host selection, etc …)

Extended inheritance account for microbiomes?

  • Maternal Effects
  • Indirect Genetic Effects
  • Niche Construction
  • Multilevel Selection

Maternal Effects

Definition:

influence of parent trait on offspring trait

Indirect Genetic Effects

Definition:

genotype of one individual influences trait of another individual

Niche Construction

Definition 1:

organism activity alters environment

Definition 2:

organism activity alters selection pressures

Two perspectives:

  1. microbiome as environment

  2. microbiome modifying environment

Multilevel Selection

  • MLS1: Selection on “individuals” in groups (host-associated microbes)
    • within group selection for individuals
    • among group selection for individuals
  • MLS2: Selection on “groups” (hosts)

Multilevel Selection 1 (on microbes)

Colonization-based selection:

covariance of microbe trait α with occurance within host relative to prevalence in environment (colonization w)

Proliferation-based selection:

covariance of microbe trait α with difference in abundance across host development stages (proliferation w)

Multilevel Selection 2 (on hosts)

Conclusion

PROS

  • Maternal Effects ~ vertical parent-offspring inheritance
  • Indirect Genetic Effects ~ horizontal social inheritance
  • Niche Construction ~ horizontal environmental inheritance
  • Multilevel Selection ~ quantify alignment of evolutionary interests

CONS

  • Lack realism, need testing
  • Assessment of microbiome-mediated adaptation requires synthesis
    • Designed for unique biology of host-microbiome systems

Working on it!

  • Microbiome Mediated Rescue of Host Populations
  • Quantitative Genetics of Microbiome Mediated Traits
  • Multilevel Selection and Maintenance of Costly Mutualists
  • Evolution of Microbiome Mediated Traits
    • Niche Construction

Working on it!

  • Microbiome Mediated Rescue of Host Populations
  • Quantitative Genetics of Microbiome Mediated Traits
  • Multilevel Selection and Maintenance of Costly Mutualists
  • Evolution of Microbiome Mediated Traits
    • Niche Construction

Microbiome Mediated Rescue of Host Populations

Quantitative Genetics of Microbiome Mediated Traits

Host Trait Variance Partitioning

\[P=G+M+E\]

  • \(P\)phenotypic variation
  • \(G\)explained by genetic var
  • \(M\)explained by microbiome var
  • \(E\)explained by other stuff

Microbiome Partitioning

\[M=M_L+M_N+M_V\]

  • \(M_L\)lineal microbes
  • \(M_N\)non-lineal microbes
  • \(M_V\)novel microbes

Predictions

  • \(M_L\) ~ most adaptive potential
  • \(M_N\) ~ less adaptive potential
  • \(M_V\) ~ least adaptive potential

Limits of Current Quantitative Genetic Approach

  • Variance partitioning general ✔️
  • Classical adaptation predictions assume:
    • Mendelian inheritance
    • Many loci small effect
    • Random mating
    • etc …
  • Need to understand microbiome inheritance process:
    • Transmission
    • Dynamics
    • Patterns

Part2: A Metacommunity Ecology Approach

Metacommunity Idea

  • Dispersal among discrete patches
  • Local interspecific interactions
  • Habitat filtering

Host-Associated Microbiome Metacommunity

  • Transmission between hosts
  • Within host interactions
  • Host control

Why we need new theory (a matter of scale)

  • Extreme abundance asymmetry
    • local abundances astronomical compared to number of dispersers
  • Transmission mediated by host structure
    • constrained by social contact and environmental proximity
  • Discretely packaged transmission events
    • concentrated pulses instead of continuous flow
  • Strong demographic buffering locally
    • transmission alters composition, not abundance
  • Implications:
    • different dynamics ~ different patterns
    • microbiome diversity likely linked to host sociality

A Model

\[dN_i^k=\left({\color{yellow}{r_i^k}}-{\color{red}{\sum_{j=1}^S\alpha_{ij}^kN_j^k}}\right)N_i^k\,dt + \sum_{\ell=1}^K{\color{magenta}{T_{\ell\leftrightarrow k}(dt,dN)}}% + %{\color{green}{\varepsilon_{\ell k}e_i}})N_{i\ell} % - \sum_{\ell=1}^K({\color{purple}{\psi_{k\ell}s_{k\ell}^i}} + % {\color{olive}{\varepsilon_{k\ell}e_{k\ell}^i}})N_{ik} +{\color{lime}{e_i^k\,N_i^k\,dE_i^k}} +{\color{skyblue}{\beta_i^k\sqrt{N_i^k}\,dD_i^k}}\]

  • \(i=\) microbe species 1,…,S
  • \(k=\) host individual 1,…,K
  • \(N_i^k=\) abundance microbe \(i\) in host \(k\)

\(\color{yellow}{\circ}\) \(=\) habitat filtering / host selection

\(\color{red}{\circ}\) \(=\) competition / ecological network

\(\color{magenta}{\circ}\) \(=\) social contact

\(\color{lime}{\circ}\) = environmental stochasticity

\(\color{skyblue}{\circ}\) \(=\) demographic stochasticity

\({\color{lime}{E_i^k}},\,{\color{skyblue}{D_i^k}}\,=\) Brownian motions

Transmission

  • \({\color{magenta}{T_{\ell\leftrightarrow k}}}\,=\) jump process
    • \(\Psi_{\ell k}\,=\) jump rate btwn hosts \(\ell,\,k\)
      • (social contact network)
    • size of jumps for \(N_i^\ell,\,N_i^k\) :
      • \(B_i^kC_i^k\)
      • \(B_i^k\sim\mathrm{Bern}(L(N_i^k))\)
      • \(C_i^k\sim\mathrm{Exp}(c)\)
      • \(c\,=\) chonk size parameter

Viscocity Hypothesis

  • Idea:
    • mutulists move freely
      • lower viscocity
      • colonization is easier
    • pathogens face more resistance
      • higher viscocity
      • need more attempts to colonize
  • Prediction:
    • pathogen diversity accumulates in clusters
    • mutualist diversity accumulates in bridges

(Extremely) Preliminary Results

Conclusion